![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
The Griffin Photography Museum was pretty cool, if pretty tiny.
They were giving away photography books because they didn't have enough space.
One of the staff told me that polaroid that looks like ink may have been in an acid wash. Another once underexposed a cyanotype or did some steps prematurely so it looked purple instead of cyan. I'll have to look into that.
They had a setup where you could put things on a photosensitive paper. I'll try to get them up at some point in September; I'm having scanner problems. I'd like to scan them, but I'll photograph them if I have to. Someone named Emma (she's right, there are a lot of people named Emma) did one of her hand and it looked three-dimensional.
There was a book you could doodle in. It's called Behind A Little House and it's by Manuel Cosentino, which autocorrect fixed for me without me noticing. To "consenting," which is so ironic it's like O. Henry and Alanis Morissette had a baby and named it that exact situation, because I did not consent to that autocorrect.
Someone drew an eyeball, someone drew the Zakim Bridge and the UK and US flags, someone drew nuclear power plant cooling towers, I drew dinosaurs.
giant sushi with a nude man as the sashimi.
a nude woman with a domestic goose, its tail feathers obscuring her naughty bits.
BIG.
Deborah Hamon - Blue Whiteout
http://www.claireawarden.com/mimesis.html
it's number 15. It was done by spitting on halides in negatives.
Sandra Klein - Wallportrait Nicole
Sandra Klein - something something Ophelia
http://lenscratch.com/2013/04/sandra-klein/
They all merge anatomical drawings with photographs of plants.
I don't know what Google did to their image search. Or their search in general. I can't seem to directly access images via Google Search and if they're going to change things
burning question: why can't they bring back discussion and blog search? That's what we want, not endless site redesigns.
They were giving away photography books because they didn't have enough space.
One of the staff told me that polaroid that looks like ink may have been in an acid wash. Another once underexposed a cyanotype or did some steps prematurely so it looked purple instead of cyan. I'll have to look into that.
They had a setup where you could put things on a photosensitive paper. I'll try to get them up at some point in September; I'm having scanner problems. I'd like to scan them, but I'll photograph them if I have to. Someone named Emma (she's right, there are a lot of people named Emma) did one of her hand and it looked three-dimensional.
There was a book you could doodle in. It's called Behind A Little House and it's by Manuel Cosentino, which autocorrect fixed for me without me noticing. To "consenting," which is so ironic it's like O. Henry and Alanis Morissette had a baby and named it that exact situation, because I did not consent to that autocorrect.
Someone drew an eyeball, someone drew the Zakim Bridge and the UK and US flags, someone drew nuclear power plant cooling towers, I drew dinosaurs.
giant sushi with a nude man as the sashimi.
a nude woman with a domestic goose, its tail feathers obscuring her naughty bits.
BIG.
Deborah Hamon - Blue Whiteout
http://www.claireawarden.com/mimesis.html
it's number 15. It was done by spitting on halides in negatives.
Sandra Klein - Wallportrait Nicole
Sandra Klein - something something Ophelia
http://lenscratch.com/2013/04/sandra-klein/
They all merge anatomical drawings with photographs of plants.
I don't know what Google did to their image search. Or their search in general. I can't seem to directly access images via Google Search and if they're going to change things
burning question: why can't they bring back discussion and blog search? That's what we want, not endless site redesigns.
